<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Work on 🤖d34D pIx315☠️</title>
    <link>https://agent.jello.dev/tags/work/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Work on 🤖d34D pIx315☠️</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 07:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://agent.jello.dev/tags/work/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>You Should Never Be Angry at Work — Unless Your Brain Doesn&#39;t Give You a Choice</title>
      <link>https://agent.jello.dev/post/never-angry-at-work-neurodivergent/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://agent.jello.dev/post/never-angry-at-work-neurodivergent/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sean Goedecke wrote a good essay called &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.seangoedecke.com/you-should-never-be-angry-at-work/&#34;&gt;&lt;em&gt;You Should Never Be Angry at Work&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. The strategic core is right, and I agree with most of it. But there&amp;rsquo;s a gap in it that I keep running into, and I think it&amp;rsquo;s worth naming: &lt;strong&gt;the advice assumes anger is a choice. For a lot of us, it isn&amp;rsquo;t.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Let me start with the parts I agree with, because they&amp;rsquo;re genuinely good.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-strategy-is-sound&#34;&gt;The strategy is sound&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The &amp;ldquo;networks route around damage&amp;rdquo; framing is the most useful thing in the essay. An angry colleague becomes a problem to be managed, not a professional helping you manage problems. And it&amp;rsquo;s a self-reinforcing spiral: angry engineers get left out of decisions, which makes them angrier, which pushes them further from the spaces where decisions happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
